Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/11/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] "Proper" portrait lens.
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 08:31:19 +0530
References: <AANLkTinGp9HbvBvkt-2VnU6+C8seHjhT3TwhAeHaDL+V@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimpqzK44j9ej_LGaRqmD6AKxCKmEzSdfwXnTyS8@mail.gmail.com>
Isn't a digital CL called an X1?
Cheers
Jayanand
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:44 AM, James Laird <digiratidoc at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Absolutely. I only hope Leica is listening. After bringing out their
> tour de force, the M9, what better to top that than a full frame
> digital CL? Hell I'd buy one, I don't care if it cost $1000;~)
>
> Jim Laird
>
>
Replies:
Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] "Proper" portrait lens.)
In reply to:
Message from lrzeitlin at gmail.com (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] "Proper" portrait lens.)
Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] "Proper" portrait lens.)