Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It doesn't have a bad rep though what it has is it an amazingly good rep as nothing short of a phenomenon the only place it has a bad re is on the LUG. Find one single negative thing said about it anywhere I've looked for hours. Though I've shot thousands of shots with it over 7.1 years and I'd not care what kind of rep it had. I have the results. It was my main lens on my trip over here. http://rabinergroup.com/EastWest/index.htm 90% of these shots were done with this lens. Though these are too small here to see or to know anything about it. And its being used cropped DX 1.5 Its a full frame lens and I'm really loving it more now in the past three days now that I can expertise the full thing about it. -------------------- Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ mark at rabinergroup.com Cars: http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb > From: Mike Durling <durling at cox.net> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:24:31 -0400 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Nikon or Canon Full Frame; All Good (Older User's > Perspective) > > I use and love this lens. I don't know why it gets a bad rep. I'm only > getting the middle of the image via the cropped sensor. I'd almost be > tempted, if I could justify it, to get a D700 or even a Nikon film body > just to see what this baby can do on full frame. > > Its big though so I'm more likely to carry the M4 or the little Olympus XA > for casual use. > > Mike Durling