Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark writes: "If I was running the AARP I'd sue Vivitar this is an assault to older people. Though basally they only insult themselves. I for one will never buy another product with the words "Vivitar" on them again and I mean it. Though I honestly thought they'd gone under a decade ago. And had been put in an old cameras companies home where they can watch TV till they die." - - - - - As a card carrying member of the AARP generation, I'm not insulted in the least. I am a technophile but my lovely wife is challenged by the telephone. Although we have owned a digital TV for two years, she has never learned to turn it and the cable box on. As far as computers go, FUGGEDABOUDIT. She does own a digital camera which I have to turn on and show her which button to press to take a picture. On the other hand. she is a prize winning artist and has had her works hung in major museums. Her hobby is stone masonry and she lays bricks and cuts stones like a master. She would welcome a simple camera that she just has to point and click the shutter and then receive finished prints. I'm sure there are millions like her. Incidentally, she has won prizes in photography as well but I have to load the film for her. Vivitar, Polaroid, Contax, Bell and Howell and Exacta all went out of business. The venerable names were bought by other companies and by distributors who apply them to products made by other firms. Others, like Leica, license their names. I have "Leica" cameras made by Fuji and by Panasonic. Larry Z