Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Philippe Amard offered: >>All part of the European motleyed culture, which " Lluis's Legs " are part >>and parcel of. Great photograph in the long standing tradition. <<<< Bon Jour Philippe, Certainement! > The Devil is a woman (M. Dietrich, and Bardot later) :-) Lluis picture is beautiful in it's advertising simplicity! We see legs and bare bottoms, at least I didn't say "bare boobs!" nearly every time we pick-up a magazine, fashion or photography. I'm quite surprised how a B&W / colour photograph of some woman's legs can be seen in a negative " not a nice kind of photo to be seen by the public because it degrades women?" Or some other inane reason! Actually the truth is those with "DIRTY MINDS" turned it into a "DIRTY" photograph. Get over it, it's not degrading in the least! Just look at the checkout counter "REAL TRASH HOLLYWOOD SLUTS TRASH MAGS" if you want to see degrading women! Let's look at the same picture in this context? A completely different context which could happen to some of the professional shooters on list! Me included as I shot fashion in Canada & Paris in the mid sixties... Oh my goodness those Paris models.............. .Oh la la! OK no more, what happens in Paris? ;-) Stays in Paris! :-) If Lluis offered this about his picture: "I was asked to shoot some fashion pictures today of women's new style nylons blended with silk and here is one of the photos chosen by the advertising agency!" That's it! Actually quite clean and simple! There wouldn't have been one negative comment the likes we've seen! So get over it and your minds out of the gutter and think it's just a photograph because the photographer was "observant" and saw a photographic moment without any twisted mind! My heavens sometimes I wonder? Dr. Ted Grant!