Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ric: I have an E-510. They seem to go for about $250 used for the body these days. I must admit I've barely touched mine since I picked up a used G1 for $300, not much more. You can find some very good information on the E-510 here. http://wrotniak.net/photo/43/index.html (just search for "510") I find this E510 article better than the "real" manual! http://wrotniak.net/photo/43/e510-sett.html The E-510 has good image quality, but it is not a Leica, it has an AA filter, and it shows. It's got the usual 4/3 noise in the shadows at all but ISO 100, and maybe even then. It matters if you pixel-peep, not so much if you print. ISO 800 is probably the practical limit except in emergencies. The viewfinder is small, so manual focusing can be difficult. It has body-based image stabilization (IS), so you get the benefit with any lens. For using the IS with manual lenses, there is an option to enter the focal length via a menu in the current firmware. The E-510 also has live view on the rear screen, which can be magnified for focusing. But getting in and out of the mode is time-consuming, and the usual annoyances about stop-down metering and shooting apply. Bottom line, I think, is that if you want to do scenics where the scenery is not going anywhere, using the OM lenses is quite viable. If you want to do action, you are going to want a lens with all the automation available. If you can find a used copy of the Zuiko Digital 40-150 f/3.5-4.5 (discontinued, usually ~$125) you will have a tele zoom lens with full automation that is very, very good despite its budget status. I think it's better than the newer, smaller, slower 40-150. I've tried the OM 100/2.8 on my E-510, results very good. I've also used the 50/1.4 on the G1, results also very good. I've tried the 135/3.5 on the E-510, results good, but with some weird chromatic stuff in the out of focus areas. The OM 50/3.5 macro is a stellar lens, and it shows on any body you care to use it on. Remember 4/3 doubles the effective magnification of your lens, so a 50 is a 100, a 100 is a 200, etc. I like the G1 better for telephoto stuff--the magnified electronic viewfinder makes for very easy manual focusing. But the image stabilization is in the Panasonic lenses, so you will need artificial supports more. I think the G1 has slightly better image quality than the E-510, but they are in the same ballpark. If you look on my leica-users gallery, you'll find a lot of E-510 shots. Start on this page: http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/pklein/album170/?g2_page=12 with this shot, and go backwards. http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/pklein/album170/P8122248HeartTransplant-w.jpg.html These were with the OM 135/3.5 http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/pklein/album170/P8312345GirlSlide-w.jpg.html http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/pklein/album170/P8312358SGalBleachers-w.jpg.html And I think these were with the 100/2.8 (as I said, this lens is wonderful) http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/pklein/album170/P9072469CrestedChin-w.jpg.html http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/pklein/album170/P8312354ShihTzu-w.jpg.html http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/pklein/album170/P8312368CrowWires-w.jpg.html This was the moon with a Vivitar 70-150 and matched teleconverter, cropped. Not bad. http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/pklein/album170/P91125161Moon-w.jpg.html This one, and the next five are with the 40-150 Digital Zuiko I mentioned earlier: http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/pklein/album170/P9132538MuscleSwimSound-w.jpg.html And this shot and the next 7 are with the E-510 and DZ 14-54/2.8-3.5, which I kept from my E-1 of yesteryear. http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/pklein/album170/P5032695ImInJail-bw.jpg.html Hope this helps. Any more questions? Feel free to ask. --Peter Ric wrote: > Anyone know about the Olympus e510? looking for something to strap > some OM lenses to for telephoto work. There's one locally i may look > at. I know there are better options, but I've got another kid starting > college. > Ric Carter