Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 8/1/2010 4:18 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote: > Once you have a larger sized sheet film neg in your hands you have a slew > of > so called "alternate" processes to choose from at the top of the list tends > to be Platinum. And silver gelatin is on the list for sure. > People, including E Weston who were were just talking about enlarged to > 8x10. > But that's a loss of a generation. > > When you simply "output to film negative" in effect from a Photoshop file > it > does not feel like you are adding a generation to the process. You don't > feel like you're loosing anything in a translation or transformation. > > > > If I thought I would make a pt/pd contact print, I would develop the negative for a high dmax, usually in one of the pyro developers such as PMK or Rollo. Usually I could also make a silver print with grade 0 or 1 paper or filtered equivalent, but not always. I tried the inkjet negs but without a lot of success. I'm skeptical that they would ever work well with silver, a much more demanding process because of the detail the paper can capture (as compared to papers used for alt processes). But, it would be neat if it worked out - sort of the best of both worlds. Imagine making an 11x14 neg from a digital image to contact print on palladium or platinum or both, where you don't even need a darkroom for printing. Ken Carney