Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/07/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Photoshopping truth - a polemic
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:39:03 -0500
References: <2036684.1278623019795.JavaMail.root@elwamui-muscovy.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <A1B62D3E-F6E2-4748-8D76-DA0C3EC8D3B7@embarqmail.com>

? I love the smell of deconstruction in the afternoon ;~)


On Jul 8, 2010, at 4:10 PM, Ric Carter wrote:

> then your problem is not with the photo's "reality", but its procedure?
> 
> I can see your point as some violation of some frame-faithful 
> photographer's artistic integrity, but that's another discussion
> 
> On Jul 8, 2010, at 5:03 PM, Philip F wrote:
> 
>> Nope. No problem if the photographer took those steps to make it. 
>> Phil Forrest
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Ric Carter <ricc at embarqmail.com>
>>> Sent: Jul 8, 2010 3:05 PM
>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Photoshopping truth - a polemic
>>> 
>>> Here we go with the mojo voodoo of the frame again. What is the frame 
>>> but the first crop of the scene?
>>> 
>>> What is its magic?
>>> 
>>> Would you have to problem if the photographer took a couple of steps and 
>>> deleted here from the original frame?

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist







In reply to: Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip F) ([Leica] Photoshopping truth - a polemic)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Photoshopping truth - a polemic)