Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/07/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 7/6/2010 4:48 PM, Tina Manley wrote: > A photographic lie in the The Economist: > > http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/05/on-the-economists-cover-only-a-part-of-the-picture/?src=twt&twt=mediadecodernyt > > <http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/05/on-the-economists-cover-only-a-part-of-the-picture/?src=twt&twt=mediadecodernyt>The > editor's explanation is pretty lame. > > Tina > > I agree completely. Another reason why I think, if you weren't there, you will not know what actually happened. That applies to the Economist, NYT, Drudge, CNN or whoever. That is also why we pay about $30,000 per year for our vetted research databases. Anyone who cites something from Google et al. is summarily executed. Ken Carney Oklahoma City, Oklahoma