Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/07/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Photoshopping for Truth? (and a sneaky real estate FS Friday)
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 20:48:46 -0400

> A photographic lie in the The Economist:
> 
> http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/05/on-the-economists-cover-only-
> a-part-of-the-picture/?src=twt&twt=mediadecodernyt
> 
> <http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/05/on-the-economists-cover-only
> -a-part-of-the-picture/?src=twt&twt=mediadecodernyt>The
> editor's explanation is pretty lame.
> 
> Tina


In the days of LIFE magazine she would have been air brushed out with analog
air brush juice; not cloned out and no one could thought to have cared.
Now its demon  digital and Photoshop and we are looking a intense untruths
being foisted upon us. People just eat that stuff right up.  I've not read
the whole thing but the graphic impact of Obama with oil rig and water is
very clean to me for a magazine cover. Not having the gal on the right
distorts the meaning? Of course not.

[Rabs]
Mark William Rabiner





Replies: Reply from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] Photoshopping for Truth?)
Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Photoshopping for Truth? (and a sneaky real estate FS Friday))
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Photoshopping for Truth? (and a sneaky real estate FS Friday))