Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/06/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I've been using LR3 since the beta version came out. It's the least buggy of any software I've tried. Early versions crashed occasionally but I never lost any work because of crashes. Mine hasn't crashed in over a year now. PSC5 has crashed twice since I installed it, but started back up immediately with no problems. I also used that in beta before it came out. The beta version had lots of bugs but they've all been worked out, as far as I can tell. Tina On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Robert D. Baron <rbaron at concentric.net>wrote: > I have been a civil trial lawyer for over 40 years. I have found no > reason to be cynical. :-) > > I think you both make good points but for the time being I am going to > err on the side of economy and just upgrade LR. > > You would think it has been in public beta long enough that the major > bugs have been squashed, but <sigh> probably not all of them are dead > yet. I guess I just need another challenge in my life to keep it > interesting. > > Thanks for the comments and advice, both of you. > > --Bob > > ==On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at > frozenlight.eu> > wrote: > > Well, yes, I am cynical. After all, I was educated as an economist, and > we are a cynical lot :-) > > > > I do dislike Adobe's upgrade policies, but I do very much like Lightroom. > I will upgrade to LR3 once the kinks have been ironed out--Adobe > notoriously > brings out buggy software. I have no idea what RAW synchronization is, but > like Bob, I am a VERY occasional user of Photoshop (as in once every 3 > months maybe), so upgrading it seems a waste of money. > > > > -- Tina Manley, ASMP www.tinamanley.com