Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/06/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Geoff, I am in the financial sector, I deal with peoples savings on a day to day basis and if my clients were worried about spending US$99, I would advocate against them buying an M9 in the first place, or selling the M9 they cannot afford to own, not worry about an upgrade that it is not even essential. That is the reality of the financial implications of your message. Cheers Jayanand On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com> wrote: > Highly amusing and 'bitching' is pretty tough commenting on the people > asking maybe Jayanand. > I agree that the upgrade price is reasonable (and I'd pay anyway if needed) > but why pay if it is unnecessary? > I think that you are somewhere in the financial sector aren't you? You're > not advocating that people waste money, I'm sure. > > The situation is already clear. > Anyone who has purchased an LR2 licence previously can pay the upgrade > price > to get an LR3 licence. > > If you purchased a licence previously AND have not used your Leica serial > number and TAN then you can either get an extra LR2 licence today (so you > could install on more than two computers if desired) ?or otherwise dispose > of that extra licence as you wish (subject to whatever the EULA says) > > If you have not used your Leica serial number and TAN ?to download then > just > wait a little longer and you will be able to use them to download LR3. > Leica > Camera already indicated this on an offical site. > > > > > Cheers > Geoff > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman