Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Apr 28, 2010 at 09:14 PM -0500, James Laird wrote: > I saw the updates for Nikonscan on their webite and downloaded them. > What's the difference between Vuescan and Nikonscan? (Mind you I don't > even have the scanner yet, I'm just trying to get ahead of the > learning curve;) Nikonscan lets you use digital ICE for one, which is nice for color neg and slides. It removes dust and scratches for you. It doesn't work on silver B&W however. Nikonscan also does some interpretation of the color for you. I've been happy with Nikonscan's color for the most part, so I just scan in there for color and tweak in Photoshop. I've tried doing B&W with it, but it seems harder for me to get a flat scan. Vuescan also lets you select the channel you use to make B&W, which can make a difference in sharpness. Since I do my own B&W, if I want small scans for flickr and such, I have to do them myself. Vuescan is pretty quick if you set it to 1333 dpi; much quicker than Nikonscan in my experience. That's enough for a 4x6 print at 300dpi. I don't dev my own color. I always get scans done at the time of dev, so I only scan the files I want at 4000dpi and I don't need this faster small scan functionality for color. It's easy to get a flat scan of B&W negs in Vuescan. So the long and short of it is that I find Vuescan faster for low res scans and easy to get flat B&W scans, while Nikonscan gives good color for me and lets me use ICE, so I use that for color. I don't know how well Vuescan works with the 9000 or the batch feeders on the 5000. You might get more functionality out of those scanners with Nikonscan.