Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/04/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] New Summilux-M 35/1.4 ASPH. #11663
From: benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney)
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 08:14:37 +0930
References: <C7F54BCE.68783%joseph@yao.com> <034b01cae1db$4485fe80$cd91fb80$@net> <034c01cae1dc$db82d640$928882c0$@net> <k2l36172e5a1004220517xaf8527adp7b363958729f96f1@mail.gmail.com> <52C9D7B2-A7C7-4644-84FF-889FFF30F184@ameritech.net>
> Do these have the same vulnerable outside threads that the Tri-Elmar
> 16-18-21mm has? ?Is there some kind of cover that >protects the threads
> when the hood is off (the Tri-Elmar uses the hood for that purpose)? ?Of
> course, the idea may be to leave >it permanently mounted (which is curious
> - I never get flare with my current ASPH, using no hood).
Yes and yes.
Mine flares very readily. I wondered if something was wrong with it,
so I sent it to Leica who said it was within spec. Mine is chrome and
maybe something internally isn't as well blacked out as it should be.
Marty
Replies:
Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] New Summilux-M 35/1.4 ASPH. #11663)
Reply from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] New Summilux-M 35/1.4 ASPH. #11663)
In reply to:
Message from joseph at yao.com (Joseph Yao) ([Leica] New Summilux-M 35/1.4 ASPH. #11663)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] New Summilux-M 35/1.4 ASPH. #11663)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] New Summilux-M 35/1.4 ASPH. #11663)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] New Summilux-M 35/1.4 ASPH. #11663)
Message from dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella) ([Leica] New Summilux-M 35/1.4 ASPH. #11663)