Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/03/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] How healthy is street photography?
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:40:28 -0500
References: <6a7544a61003281635s7425cf49o433dd56b93cb5b3e@mail.gmail.com> <419FBA25-669F-4342-9952-16ACAD1378B9@gmail.com> <03C70E75-A424-457E-A420-2B27DE110219@mac.com> <19b6d42d1003301053m71b44244ne853302e842cfa61@mail.gmail.com> <4B0A2CCA-D59E-4561-BFBC-F134501F5CA7@mac.com>
Further:
The current state of editing and criticism
also feel seriously diluted
due to the ease of so-called "publishing" on line.
;~)
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
On Mar 30, 2010, at 4:07 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:
> I totally agree that lack of serious editors and serious criticism
> only adds to the ocean of mediocrity.
In reply to:
Message from lrzeitlin at gmail.com (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] How healthy is street photography?)
Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] How healthy is street photography?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] How healthy is street photography?)
Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] How healthy is street photography?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] How healthy is street photography?)