Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Summilux 21 and 24mm M lenses...
From: zoeica at mac.com (Chris Williams)
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:31:36 -0500
References: <70425F5B-3A16-4D74-A9C0-023F7A4FF9B9@gmail.com> <004a01cacc2e$3c2eea70$80f510ac@chris0436b6050> <19b6d42d1003251004k4d1815a5h6da2fe921e7609f6@mail.gmail.com>
 
Probably crazy, you are on the LUG :)

I don't see his 50's as being wide, but then a 50 on a M9 is going to seem 
wide compared to a M8!

Chris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Vince Passaro"
Subject: Re: [Leica] Summilux 21 and 24mm M lenses...


> Am I blind, stupid or senile, or do all the 50mm shots on your friend's 
> site
> look wider than the 24's? Does he always crop the 24s or am I just crazy?
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Chris Williams <zoeica at mac.com> wrote:
>
>> Fellow Louisiana photographer Jason Cohen uses the 24mm and used to have
>> the 21mm I believe.
>>
>> http://jasoncohenphoto.com/category/leica/
>>
>> Chris
In reply to: Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Summilux 21 and 24mm M lenses...)
Message from zoeica at mac.com (Chris Williams) ([Leica] Summilux 21 and 24mm M lenses...)
Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] Summilux 21 and 24mm M lenses...)