Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Le 20 mars 10 ? 22:25, John Nebel a ?crit : > Taken literally that doesn't make much sense; I should have said > something like it is lot hungrier for light than a 35mm. > > Expected, given a slower lens spreading the rays out over a bigger > area, but initially surprising with a camera that looks like an R8. > Looks aren't everything. > Could you be more explicit if you have time to, curious minds want to understand. TIA Philippe > John NO ARCHIVE