Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Tina wrote: "I think it's terrible that everybody has gotten so paranoid about photographers. If I was in a public park with my children and someone came up and started photographing them, I would just be flattered that they thought my kids were cute! Maybe living in the South is different. We would probably strike up a conversation starting with who we were kin to and where we go to church. We would discover that we are second cousins, twice removed, and our pastor's son married their granddaughter. I'm just not naturally suspicious of anybody. Nobody has ever questioned me when I'm out photographing in public places. I know there are bad people out there, but there are a whole lot more really nice ones and some of them are even photographers!" Tina, I share your sentiments but with almost daily reports of pedophilia and/or child abduction, as well as the proliferation of photographs on the web for unsavory purposes, some restrictions may be the lesser evil in some situations. The playgrounds of several small neighborhood city parks in San Francisco have been posted for years with "photographing children is prohibited" signs. I avoid them because the parents or grandparents who bring their children not only don't know me personally but I am obviously a stranger. In the park where we often meet our grandchildren, ages 3 and 5, (and I photograph them and their friends at play or soccer practice) I am not a stranger. While there aren't any signs that photography is prohibited I suspect that someone whose appearance doesn't fit in would be questioned by a parent if that stranger were to photograph his/her child. As a practical matter, invoking a First Amendment right would probably be beside the point, as the situation would no longer lend itself to casual photography of subjects who are not aware of or not concerned about the photographer. Oliver