Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark writes: "I think if you cracked open an M9 it would not look too much like a M3. It's a computer not a clock. *** I had a conversation with a semi retired taxi driver in a McDonalds at 3 in the morning a few weeks ago he shot Leicas in the Korean war and printed in the darkroom for the Army." - - - - - - - I was told a number of years ago by a production engineer in the Leica Canada plant, that by far the most expensive sub assembly in the Leica body was the viewfinder/rangefinder and its associated cams. Essentially the same assembly is used in the digital Leicas. If you were a horologist you would appreciate the fact that precision mechanical clockwork is MUCH more expensive than electronic parts that perform a similar function. A digital Timex tells time better than a mechanical Rolex but costs 1/1000 as much. Do you remember the taxi driver's name? I shot Leicas in Korean war combat too as part of my duties with Conarc. Conarc, based at the US Armor Center in Ft. Knox was charged with specifying the requirements for tanks and other armored vehicles. Despite driving by the gold vault for months, I never got to see any of the gold. There is a rumor that it was all sold to the Saudis. Larry Z