Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Tina M. wrote: Those are fantastic. I'm at the other end of the extreme and want people to hold my 8x10 prints in their hands to look at the people and feel a connection that comes through getting close to the photo. ================================================= I'm the same. I actually dislike too-large prints, although there are obviously situations that call for huge ones. I enjoy the intimacy of a Polaroid held in the hand, love the old Walker Evans SX-70 sets, don't want to move my eyes back and forth to encompass the frame, want to be aware of all four edges, want to grasp the composition in a single take, etc. That's why the long threads about pixel pitch and sensor size don't interest me. I realize that ultimately, bigger is technically better, but in my personal photo world it doesn't matter. *However*, the trend in the fine arts photo world has been toward really huge! Jeff Wall, Tina Barney, Andreas Gursky, etc. Someone wrote recently that in the 21st c. the traditional quest for formal balance (a la HCB) is being replaced by an art that is not so much a rhetoric of form as a display of idea writ large. So the (my) taste for concise presentation of formal balance may be out of date. In the same vein, I also like to sit near the back of a movie theater! -- Phil Swango 307 Aliso Dr SE Albuquerque, NM 87108 505-262-4085