Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Zeiss Wide Angle 35mm f/2 Biogon T* ZM
From: taniel.dan at gmail.com (Daniel Tan)
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:20:56 +1000
References: <6841F8FF-7226-4BC1-8D0C-92DC7D99AAEB@gmail.com> <C7AE22D3.5E416%mark@rabinergroup.com>
 
On 27 February 2010 16:16, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:

>
> Its a ZM lens we refer to on the LUG.
> It cost a thousand dollars.
> A Summicron cost three thousand dollars.
> You want to compare them straight across you think that's wise?
>


Considering that we are dealing with the best optical designs in the
industry, would it not be wise to examine all options based on their merits
rather than disregard a 'mere' $1000 lens just because the one labelled
Leica costs 3 times more?

:Dan
Replies: Reply from chris at chriscrawfordphoto.com (Chris Crawford) ([Leica] Zeiss Wide Angle 35mm f/2 Biogon T* ZM)
 In reply to: Message from bamboozld at gmail.com (K Landdeck) ([Leica] Zeiss Wide Angle 35mm f/2 Biogon T* ZM)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Zeiss Wide Angle 35mm f/2 Biogon T* ZM)