Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> I think it's short sighted (perhaps the word) to call the photo cluttered. > Clearly the room they're in is cluttered but the photo itself is governed > by > a definable geometry and by clear and forceful separation of areas of dark > and light. There is a diagonal line running down from the upper right to > the > middle left that passes just across the top of the mother's and boy's > heads; > another suggested line that bifurcates the photo and passes through their > waists, more or less (in her case, an empire waist perhaps). And finally a > lovely parabola that begins a the boy's right wrist, and traces along the > tops of his arms and up onto his mother's shoulders and across and down > her > left arm that -- if you let your imagination continue it -- lands at the > little girl's feet -- so that they are pulled together around a black > center > (the blackest part of which, btw, strongly suggests a valentine). The so > called clutter is incidental, it is real life, it is the equivalent of > clouds in the sky or ripples on the sea, its existence is what allows us > to > see the actual meanings that lie beneath. you have said that so much better than I did. Busy and cluttered, but real life. Thanks