Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Edit, II
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:40:53 -0500
References: <30db39f21002150919k41147b55v5318c73fd656a3ab@mail.gmail.com> <C79EEE89.5D92A%mark@rabinergroup.com>
 
Thanks, Mark.  I definitely need the second pair of eyes, or even third and
fourth.  So many of the ones Maggie put in the A pile would have been in my
C pile.  I guess it's true that we are our own worst editors. (I am,
anyway!)

Tina

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at 
rabinergroup.com>wrote:

>
> Or much later when we are going over the shots. Or when we do this with the
> help of a second pair of eyes.
> Its not what you shoot that counts its what we show them.
>
>
> [Rabs]
> Mark William Rabiner
>
>
>
-- 
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com
Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Edit, II)
Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Edit, II)
Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Edit, II)
 In reply to: Message from rbaron at concentric.net (Robert D. Baron) ([Leica] Edit, II)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Edit, II)