Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark, >>Although the 24mm f/1.4 Nikor will appeal to people of a Leica LUG mentality such as myself the 16-35mm f/4 VR will be the most used lens of 2010 and 2011 by shooters with Nikons.<< I agree with you on that. The 16-35/4 will probably outsell the 24/1.4 by 10 to 1. Maybe 100 to 1. The only thing holding it back might be the cost. It's expensive for an f4 lens. I have a 17-35/2.8, but my (f-mount converted) 50/2 and 28/2.8 Leica lenses are used far more often on my D700. I used my 45P Nikkor for a while to save weight. (A D700 with 50/2 is surprisingly heavy). But I switched back to using the 50/2. It's hard for me to use anything but Leica lenses, given the choice. OTOH, when I read about the 24/1.4 it went immediately to the very top of my wish list. I'm not sure what I'd gain over the 28/2.8 Elmarit (or the 28/2 Nikkor, which I also own but rarely use). I don't need f1.4 or autofocus, necessarily. A 50/1.4 and 24/1.4 I could live with, though. I'm glad to see Nikon introduce lenses rather than a new body. Bodies come and go but lenses are forever. The only Nikon body that might appeal to me would be a smaller, lighter FX. Dave R