Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/02/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Pearl Harbour Photographs
From: spencer at aotera.org (Spencer Cheng)
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:08:50 -0500
References: <C7EE4192-E67A-4589-BFA3-396FA142925A@paintercreative.co.uk> <000001caa038$aad1a840$0074f8c0$@co.uk> <BC0BAE52-5D03-4558-94A7-CD5CC6AA7799@paintercreative.co.uk> <7E3BD5A162D042CF8E238295443B3F2A@LATITUDE> <993EB70B0B61EB489DD26C8F8C166118032316@MAIL.ukbizmail.com> <993EB70B0B61EB489DD26C8F8C166118032340@MAIL.ukbizmail.com> <73301d6b1002041216y69ec6a49y36dde1dc05c3a5f2@mail.gmail.com> <207D0E76-12AF-4AFE-B279-CFCC4D73838D@embarqmail.com> <4B6BD8D1.7090602@whitedogs.co.uk>
On Feb 5, 2010, at 3:37, Mark Pope wrote:
> Whatever the origin of the pictures, they do illustrate the terrifying
> effects of a major attack. I haven't read much about the history of the
> Pacific war, but that attack must have really hurt the US's capability to
> wage war for quite some considerable time. How long did it take to
> rebuild those ships and train replacement sailors and marines?
Actually, other than the battleships which were obsolete strategically, the
carriers, which someone else mentioned, and, perhaps even more importantly,
the fuel depot was not destroyed. The destruction of those 2 would quite
possibly have altered the history of WWII in the Pacific unlike the sinking
of the battleships.
IMHO of course.
Regards,
Spencer
Replies:
Reply from neal at photoneal.com (Neal Friedenthal) ([Leica] Pearl Harbour Photographs)
In reply to:
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Pearl Harbour Photographs)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Pearl Harbour Photographs)
Message from mark at whitedogs.co.uk (Mark Pope) ([Leica] Pearl Harbour Photographs)