Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Funny, I agree too, and that's why I bought it from you. :-) --Peter Peter Klein writes in part: > The Leica lens is visibly a little "better" from a technical point of > view. But the CV lens is no slouch, is certainly sharp enough, and is a > little kinder to the elderly. The Leica has more contrast and harsher > bokeh. The CV has a bit of what Erwin would call veiling flare, which > actually can lift shadows a bit, but may make shaded faces look a little > muddy. > > What I really like about the 35/1.2 is that it combines and balances the > excellent performance of modern aspheric lenses with some of the smoother, > "rounder" drawing and smoother bokeh associated with classic lenses. I > really like it. The only things I don't like about it are the size and > weight, and the fact that it will color fringe in extreme contrast > situations (backlit tree branches against the sky). I agree with the above and that is why I kept the Summilux and sold the CV 35/1.2. Greg Lorenzo Calgary, Canada