Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> I think we best enter into this discussion > the difference between > caption > and > title > > a captions serves to add relevant and/or useful (hopefully) information > a title serves to "name" the image > > very different purposes > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george at imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > On Dec 28, 2009, at 6:54 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote: > >>> My two pennorth, >>> >>> I think it all depends on what the pictures show - I can't really >>> imagine one of my (now quite numerous) town/city tours without >>> captions >>> showing where all the shots were taken. >>> >>> The same applies to the captions of Doug Herr's bird shots telling us >>> what they are (paticularly when the Latin names are used so I can >>> look >>> up what they are called over here in Germany - who knows when they >>> might >>> turn up in a translation :-) ) >>> >>> Cheers >>> Douglas >> >> >> Yes a simple dry description. A couple of words. >> I see a lot of couple of words with number or letter. >> >> >> Mark William Rabiner >> >> >> Yes caption, title and file name can be synonymous as often as not in this digital day and age. I've seen it in there in the metadata, the caption. The title. But most often not messed with it. Lately for me my file name has become the title. I guess when I did the show in Manchester I came up with some with words not numbers. The metadata needs to have a slot of "what you had for breakfast that morning" as it does for everything else. Mark William Rabiner