Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]2009-12-27-20:57:47 Kyle Cassidy: > Jeff Moore sez: > > >So pony up for a damn' M9. It's a very good camera. > > I'm sure it is -- but bang-for-the buck, I could get two more d700's with > a 50 1.2 and 35 1.4 and never have to change lenses again, or I could get > seven GF-1's and a case of scotch and leave a camera in a taxi every > couple of months for yucks..... if it were $3,000 I'd think about it, but > I'd have to put it on a scale with a D3. Right now I'd have to put it on a > scale with a D3 and a week in Cairo..... Right, but weren't you looking for something you wouldn't get scoliosis and a hump from dragging around with you? The M9 is stupid expensive compared to giant SLRs which can produce picture quality in around the same neighborhood... but, I dunno, I bet it's less than that Hasselblad digital back. And it's totally portable. And... it WORKS. And a D3 weighs 65 pounds and is as big as two severed heads in a duffel bag, which seems not to meet the criteria you set out in your original email. -Jeff M