Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I bought an M9 recently and a few lenses, revived my dormant photography habit and started posting to the LUG again. In that short time I think my photography has improved and its all down to people being honest with me. The most important thing I've learned since getting the M9 is what kind of photographer I want to be. I don't do beautiful landscapes because I haven't got the patience or inclination to get up at 4 in the morning for the right light or spend hours in photoshop honing a print and I also know that I'd still be pretty bad at it because frankly I find most landscape photography boring. I'd rather just go there on my bike and look at the scenery. I'll never be a photojournalist because I think to do it justice you need to immerse yourself in your subject and make sure that your pictures tell the whole story you wanted to tell. I have a young family and a full time job and this means that my pictures are limited to my children (and I don't post those anywhere) and the things I see in London in my 30-40 minute walks two or three times a week and on my cycle ride to the railway station. The pictures I try to take now show what I see in such short time periods. This group is a great place to force you into some self-reflection. For example some pictures I took of a climate camp in Trafalgar Square were failures because I didn't have the time to spend building the story and the subject demanded nothing less. This was pointed out to me pretty quickly. A few years ago Ted laid into a picture I took of a street singer in New York because it said nothing and he was absolutely right, it was a duff picture. The upshot of all this is that I'm pretty certain now when I take a picture about what I'm trying to say or show and am much more severe with myself when I'm editing if the picture doesn't match the idea. This makes it much easier to explain what I saw in a picture if I think its a keeper. I've learned a lot from the negative criticism my pictures receive and almost nothing from the praise (although I've got an ego like everyone else and all praise is welcome). I think the LUG can be a bit too gentle on posters some times, perhaps with the idea that any photographic effort should be encouraged. I'd love to see much more questioning of posters about why they think their picture works and much more honesty if stuff is just no good. I've noticed that bad photographs tend to get ignored rather than actively criticised while good ones get loads of responses. This is a shame, really good pictures aren't the ones that need criticism although I can understand that this is quite a friendly place and we want to be nice to each other. Anyway, thanks to anyone who's said they liked my pictures and many many thanks to people who said they didn't. Neil