Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Hi Luggers, > My Leica camera equipment for travel is beginning to divide into the > M8 plus wide angle lenses (down to the 18mm Elmar) and at the > telephoto end I am increasing my R inventory. I have the Canadian 90 > Summicron and the 180 Apo Telyt f3.4 (both famous Mandler designs) > already re-bayoneted for use on my D700. I have just acquired from Dr. > Yao a complete and pristine 400 f6.8 Telyt (as recommended by Doug > Herr - thank you Doug) and am in the process of getting the bayonet > changed on that lens. This has been complicated by the fact (which I > have transmitted to David Lladro at Leitax) that later 400 Telyts have > different cams that the single cam for which the Leitax bayonet has > been designed. Still I am getting it done. > > My question is this. I have the opportunity to pick up a 250 f4.o > Telyt to augment the telephoto set above and I am wondering if I > should. I am getting all this telephoto fire power to take wild life > pictures in Bali and Australia. > What do you all think? TIA > Howard (in Hong Kong) I suspect it depends on how strong you are ;-) I decided to take a 180 and 2x to Kakadu. I left the 280 at home and "in general" I did not regret it. 360 mm on the DMR is usually "long" enough for Aussie wild life and Bali is usually pretty "closed" in. With the 180 and 400 I would think you have it covered. Hope I can catch you in 2010 Alastair