Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Noctilux - 0.95 vs. 1.0
From: richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man)
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 21:49:07 -0800
References: <4B1B0C61.8080207@comporium.net> <C7408696.59CE3%mark@rabinergroup.com> <120720090451.17108.4B1C89E700022B6E000042D4223245003003010CD2079C080C03BF970A9D9F9A0B9D09@mchsi.com>
 
Get the Nokton, $1K, you lose the swirl but have the F1.1. Don't
compare it to the Nocti, because the Noctiluxers will burn you at
stake, but if your goal is to shoot F1.1 photos that looks like F2
photos (but with more light and shallower DoF), that's the lens to get
to save $$.

Of course if you can afford Nocti, by all means.

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:51 PM,  <grduprey at mchsi.com> wrote:
>
>
> Not having a Nocti, of any flavor, I would settle for a copy of either, If 
> I could afford the entry fee.
>



-- 
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog:
http://rfman.wordpress.com
// book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963
Replies: Reply from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] Noctilux - 0.95 vs. 1.0)
 In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Noctilux - 0.95 vs. 1.0)
Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] Noctilux - 0.95 vs. 1.0)