Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> I have Lightroom, Aperture, and Photoshop/Bridge. Of these I find > myself working within Photoshop/Bridge much more often than the other > two. Aperture has dropped off the playing field even though its human > interface blows Lightroom away. I utterly despise Lightroom's modal > nature. It's like they didn't learn ANYTHING over the past decade. > But, it's Adobe and the number of horrid GUI sins they have committed > are so numerous as to frighten small children. Aperture got that part > right, and they did a great job of keywording. But the reality is that > I I seldom keyword. I'm not like Tina who can sit at the computer and > spend lots of time labeling. It's almost foreign to my head. I > understand Photoshop and finally can be quite productive in it so I > don't feel the need to slide into a cousin program whose metaphors are > cousins to Photoshop. It's like going from the USA to Australia for me > - wrong side of the road, things work different, the language SEEMS > the same underneath there are very real differences. But, ultimately, > it's the utterly lame modal nature of Lightroom that drives me away. > > At least this is better than arguing about Macs and PC's! Or iPhones > and Droids! Oh, wait, we haven't done that yet have we? (running for > it now.....) > > Adam > Aperture! A very popular program with I think a not small market share. Which means a lot of people use it. Almost never mentioned here even it passing. This is Lightroom land. I think its an anomaly. Mark William Rabiner