Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/12/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0
From: vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko)
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 21:26:28 -0500
References: <348513.98692.qm@web82103.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <003601ca7601$59c1d300$0d457900$@net> <BLU0-SMTP47AA61E1192E61F4AC7A308C910@phx.gbl> <4B1B0C61.8080207@comporium.net> <BLU0-SMTP34E4250BC83FBB8C8FCBEA8C910@phx.gbl> <440b792d0912051800wb2101b4q853a865799126027@mail.gmail.com>
LOL.
Maybe if I win the lottery.
:-)
Vick
mehrdad wrote:
> how can you say this Vick with so much absolution! i know for a fact that
> in
> early 2011 you will be chasing one.
>
>
In reply to:
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)