Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Hexanon 50mm/1.2 (from Limited set) against 50mm Summilux pre-ASPH E46...?
From: taniel.dan at gmail.com (Daniel Tan)
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:48:31 +1000
References: <C71F600F.585B1%mark@rabinergroup.com> <1B483C24-0D93-4571-8118-092C248790CE@ameritech.net> <COL119-W152159D6208E10C58F3F4482AA0@phx.gbl>

2009/11/11 Greg Lorenzo <gregj_lorenzo at hotmail.com>

>
> Richard Wasserman writes:
>
>
> > I'll jump in here. I have a 50mm f/2 M Hexanon that is a better lens
> > than the Summicron it replaced?it doesn't flare and the build quality
> > is higher (it was also less expensive). Leica is not the only game in
> > town...
> >
>
>
> I'll add: Pentax 43/1.9 LTM lens and viewfinder, Zeiss 25/2.8 ZM lens and
> any current Zeiss external finder, Rollie's 40/2.8 and 80/2.8 lenses. All
> very well made with excellent glass.
>
>
>
> Greg Lorenzo
>
>
Don't forget the 35 UC-Hexanon and the CV 50/3,5 Heliar.

Daniel Tan


Replies: Reply from alex at zabrovsky.org (Alex Zabrovsky) ([Leica] Hexanon 50mm/1.2 (from Limited set) against 50mm Summilux pre-ASPH E46...?)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Hexanon 50mm/1.2 (from Limited set) against 50mm Summilux pre-ASPH E46...?)
Message from disfromage at ameritech.net (Richard Wasserman) ([Leica] Hexanon 50mm/1.2 (from Limited set) against 50mm Summilux pre-ASPH E46...?)
Message from gregj_lorenzo at hotmail.com (Greg Lorenzo) ([Leica] Hexanon 50mm/1.2 (from Limited set) against 50mm Summilux pre-ASPH E46...?)