Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/10/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] M9 improvements
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:19:09 -0700
References: <365332.24587.qm@web83907.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <018101ca59b9$d7f044f0$87d0ced0$@net> <20091031000020.GG3018@jbm.org> <0888B950-58B9-4206-8595-3E4F7A806FE5@gmail.com> <20091031002339.GI3018@jbm.org> <8F726E49-17A0-4D14-B39F-BCFF853C0EDF@gmail.com> <200910310140.BZZ39834@rg5.comporium.net> <22E3AF4A-C3BC-4CFA-A32A-7E1E4D168F80@gmail.com>
$40-60 vs $200+++..... Say 1:3 to be safe....
I have a HK version of the .8 (?) version. Build quality is quite high...
the problem is that the .8 does not work. You can not get a bigger field of
view....
Frank Filippone
red735i at earthlink.net
I wonder if you can give us the costs of the two,
approximately is just fine,
:-)
Steve
Replies:
Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
In reply to:
Message from dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
Message from jbm at jbm.org (Jeff Moore) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
Message from jbm at jbm.org (Jeff Moore) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] M9 improvements)