Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> true enough. > > Yet, if no one is buying the 16x20 - 30x40's > (or even the 11x14's) > I can't afford the paper they're printed on. > > The vast majority of my commercial work, > including product, portrait and events > is going on the web, on post cards, blurb books > and full 8.5 x 11 with bleeds. > > The occasional fine art print sales > rarely exceed 13x19 > which my current gear does > quite nicely. > > Only speaking for myself here. > > Would love to convince myself > that a large sensor would create > instant large print sales. > > But in reality? > It seems like a tiny elite market > and difficult to get into. > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george at imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > On Oct 6, 2009, at 4:26 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote: > >> So our 8x10's have to be looking like overkill became sometimes >> they have to >> be 11x14. Or 16x20 or 30x40. > So then your bottom line is 13x19. As mine has been I do have a portfolio of 13x19 prints they look ok. And I've yet to make a 17x22 but that may change soon. I may get to be a 17x22 and be there kinda guy very soon. Mark William Rabiner