Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/09/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark wrote: I love it how we're sitting back and second guessing the whole Leica manufacturing process like we're all experts or something. It's not like "the rewind crank on the M4 is a little stiff" or something. Lets not forget at that Leica at this point in its long existence is in the hands of Dr. Andreas Kaufmann a guy who owns a handful of successful optical companies. Leica being one card in the hand he's holding. What went into the way the manufacturing structure of Leica Digital M's has evolved we know not what. I'm somehow included to give these people the benefit of the doubt. - - - - - - - Mark, You obviously have more faith in the judgment of industry leaders than I do. Perkin-Elmer, the most respected optical company in the US, ground the mirror of the Hubble Telescope wrong. RCA, the world's premier television manufacturer after WW2 and holder of most US color television patents, is out of business. The trademark is now owned by Thompson SA, a French conglomerate. Microsoft, the world's richest computer company has seen its stock fall by 60% on the heels of the Vista debacle. General Motors, once the maker of 63% of cars sold in the US, now has a market share of 17% and was saved from bankruptcy by the kindness of US taxpayers. And there is no need to mention Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Citibank, and all the other financial high flyers that could do no wrong. Big, respected companies DO screw up, make bad decisions, fail to deliver up to expectations and drop from favor. In the 1960's Leica was the dominant expensive camera maker. In 1963 Leica sold more cameras priced over $300 (equivalent to about $3500 today) than the combined total of all competitive makers. But by astute decisions like ignoring the SLR phenomenon, failing to upgrade their cash cow M cameras, and making cameras in high labor wage markets, dissipated their lead. Today Leica's market share of expensive cameras must be viewed with a microscope to be visible. I have no faith that Leica's product design or manufacturing policies are optimum, no matter how rich Dr. Andreas Kaufmann is. Nor am I happy that they are willing to dissemble to hide engineering ineptness. Remember that just a year ago it was impossible to make full frame digital Leicas and that magenta blacks were an illusion. Good people can make bad decisions. Witness Bill Gates downplaying the importance of the internet or signing off on Vista. The brief video view of Leica's assembly process is hardly a confidence builder. Larry Z