Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>so Henning , are u saying these tow are about the same!! if so, i will keep >my nocti > >also tom's opinion these are are a bit tinted when it comes to cosina stuff > >On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Henning Wulff <henningw at >archiphoto.com>wrote: > >> Last Friday Tom Abrahamsson loaned me his blueprinted f/1.1 Nokton, and I >> shot and my v.2 Noctilux f/1 side by side on M8's. For the most critical >> stuff I used the same body and switched lenses. I took about 600 shots. >> No, the lenses are not the same. In a very simplistic fashion, they are similar in relationship to the Nokton f/1.5 and the pre-asph Summilux 50's. By extension, and this is based purely on conjecture and discussions with those who have used one, the Noctilux 0.95 might represent the 'lux ASPH in this comparison. In any case, I have a Noctilux in which I have not invested too much. I will use that lens when I need f/1. I also have a Summilux ASPH when I don't need f/1. How much better can it get? -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com