Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] M8 v M9--better printers needed
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:54:57 -0400
References: <9fd6dd7e4a3542ea7207465e6e62988c@cshore.com> <3cad89990908210519tbdc93e3qb0dd6e864c930c21@mail.gmail.com>
 
At 08:19 AM 8/21/2009, you wrote:
>Doug,
>Have you tried the new baryta papers for digital printing? I have tried two
>of them, Harmon Photo Gloss and Ilford Gold Fibre Silk. They are very good
>indeed, and the Ilford at its price point is a relative bargain..
>Cheers
>Jayanand

I agree with Jayanand.  I like the Gold Fibre Silk best. Also for B&W 
try Quadtone RIP with either black only or Piezography inks.  For 
color Image Print does a great job with the new papers, too.  They 
are much better than anything I ever managed to print in the darkroom!

Tina

Tina Manley
www.tinamanley.com
Replies: Reply from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] M8 v M9--better printers needed)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M8 v M9--better printers needed)
 In reply to: Message from dnygr at cshore.com (Douglas Nygren) ([Leica] M8 v M9--better printers needed)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] M8 v M9--better printers needed)