Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Contax 645 one more time
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:28:27 -0500
References: <36172e5a0908171900l65facef7i23bc96d668333d8@mail.gmail.com> <C6AF8999.5308D%mark@rabinergroup.com> <36172e5a0908172128l153b3266lfb83d0625ecea5fd@mail.gmail.com>

On Aug 17, 2009, at 11:28 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:

> Do you consider then that the squares were ideal for cropping from  
> for your
> output?

Yes. And the art directors loved the square because they could often  
go with the square
or horizontal or vertical.

> Worked best because you didn't need to turn the camera on its side for
> portrait format?

Yes. again - also part of the charm of the Rollei tlr - it hangs  
there at your midriff
with a window to the world - captured with a near silent click.

> You could afford to use part of each frame to allow for composition  
> error
> and output proportions?

"composition error?" feels quite unprofessional
The vast majority of my 120, 220 work
as with my sheet film work
is quite tightly cropped.

Can't imagine any pro or serious amateur
buying into a top shelf photographic system
to allow for "composition error."

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist




In reply to: Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] OT: Contax 645 one more time)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] OT: Contax 645 one more time)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] OT: Contax 645 one more time)