Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Hasselblad digi-backs, lenses - was M9 „ M8
From: sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter)
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:07:53 -0500
References: <0D984AC4-A065-4311-A904-AA8B335CDDB1@mac.com> <C6AA7952.52D8C%mark@rabinergroup.com> <a3f189160908140906k229b8a0y60a676d2dc607f8d@mail.gmail.com>
 
I guess I should have read the whole thread. ;-)

Sorry to tersely repeat George.



On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com> 
wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com>
>>
>>
>> What would be better than a contact print from an 8x10 neg?
>
>
>
> I would say an 8x10 Polaroid print.  No negative to get in the way.
>
> ;-)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Sonny
> http://www.sonc.com
> http://sonc.stumbleupon.com/
> Natchitoches, Louisiana
> (+31.754164,-093.099080)
>
>


-- 
Regards,

Sonny
http://www.sonc.com
http://sonc.stumbleupon.com/
Natchitoches, Louisiana
(+31.754164,-093.099080)


If you are wondering, the following abolishes Gmail ads.  ;-)

I enjoy the massacre of ads. This sentence will slaughter ads without a
messy bloodbath.
USA
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Hasselblad digi-backs, lenses - was M9?M8)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Hasselblad digi-backs, lenses - was M9 ? M8)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Hasselblad digi-backs, lenses - was M9 „ M8)