Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/08/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:35:57 -0700
References: <4A8328F5.4010509@san.rr.com> <523810.12285.qm@web86708.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <3cad89990908130128n384649b2u65885d7d71d0a11a@mail.gmail.com> <4A848832.3000206@san.rr.com> <3cad89990908131959k19b4c08ft49a2959c0ef7de2@mail.gmail.com>
VERY un-American. Both concept and action.
Me too, except for the house..... which I paid off years ago.
Frank Filippone
red735i at earthlink.net
It is just that I have an old fashioned aversion to debt
In reply to:
Message from glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)