Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I came to the same conclusion Frank. These systems function at peak performance as systems; with rare exceptions. However, when we discuss medium format backs with Rodenstock, Schneider or Mamiya lenses we're really discussing hybrid view camera systems. If I still had the clientele that I had in the 80's and early 90's: architectural, studio product illustration, etc. I'd be seriously looking at these hybrids which have replaced the 8x10, 4x5, 6x9, 6x7, and 6x6 tools of that era. Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Aug 13, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Frank Filippone wrote: > Unacceptable comparison to anything that is at all user friendly. > ( pick > one or more... Canon DSLR with Canon lenses, Leica DMR with Leica > Lenses, > ditto Nikon, any other system camera.... ). ( I am pretty much > consistent > with my assessment that no-auto Iris is a no show in my book, and > also for > the marketplace). > > The ONLY practical solution to a Hasselblad body assembly is > Hasselblad > lenses. If you want a digital back, you are still in the same > camp.... > Hasselblad lenses.