Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?
From: richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man)
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:16:58 -0700
References: <380-22009841321365230@M2W021.mail2web.com> <FC26A6A1-DC15-40B0-A44D-0C6813D2F929@mac.com>
 
Canon is my favorite brand to beat on :-) I dislike its colors.Yes,
that's subjective.

Nikon, now I have a soft heart for.

That's this guy that talks all days about how the clinical sharp
Japanese medium format lens :cut your eyes: if you look at the photos
for too long. So it goes...

Heck, look at the James Delano's essay on Burn that was posted a
couple weeks ago. The comment section makes funny reading.
-- 
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog:
http://rfman.wordpress.com
// book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963
Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
 In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto at earthlink.net) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)