Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:00:23 -0400
References: <C6A926DF.52C9A%mark@rabinergroup.com> <p06230904c6a961a6bb8e@10.0.1.199> <7ac27f4f0908122357i7d12480bmf8ee579e77294dad@mail.gmail.com> <B2C47416-C169-46F1-9B22-1CE37ABA697F@frozenlight.eu>
 
At 03:18 AM 8/13/2009, you wrote:
>It is not a subjective perception, Richard, but an objective
>assessment. I have an E3 too, with two of the best lenses in the E
>system, the 12-60 and the 50-200. So I am not knocking the E3 by any
>means, but it is simply not in the M8+Leica lenses league. And indeed
>it would not be reasonable to expect it to be, given the price
>difference in lenses.
>
>Nathan

The files from the M8 and Leica lenses are certainly sharper than 
anything I get from the pro Canons with their L lenses.

Tina

Tina Manley
www.tinamanley.com
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)