Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/08/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?
From: richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man)
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:24:54 -0700
References: <4A8328F5.4010509@san.rr.com> <523810.12285.qm@web86708.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <3cad89990908130128n384649b2u65885d7d71d0a11a@mail.gmail.com> <7ac27f4f0908130206k6255787cv84674ba8f7f95f96@mail.gmail.com> <3cad89990908130208r2ef495e0id25b1fbd738f254b@mail.gmail.com>
A "cheap" property in the Silicon Valley is probably $500K, and that's
probably a one bedroom condo in San Jose :-)
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Jayanand Govindaraj<jayanand at gmail.com>
wrote:
> The cheaper the better upfront?
> Cheers
--
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog:
http://rfman.wordpress.com
// book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963
Replies:
Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
In reply to:
Message from glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)