Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:29:33 +0200
References: <20090812000652.SEIBX.15482.imail@fed1rmwml38> <4A8328F5.4010509@san.rr.com>

How un-American! Are you sure you're not a closet Commie?

:-)

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog



On Aug 12, 2009, at 10:41 PM, Jerry Lehrer wrote:

> Stasys,
>
> Anyone who takes a bank loan for a hobby camera has lost their sense  
> of value.  I can confidently
> say that I have NEVER had a loan to pay for anything except my  
> house. No, I have never had a
> car loan.  I pay my credit cards at months end.  Never paid a dime's  
> interest except on my house.
>
> If I want to buy something, I save up for it, then pay cash.or  
> check.  Usually with a discount.
>
> I can see a professional taking out a loan, to improve his  
> livelihood, but not a hobbyist.
>
> Jerry Lehrer



Replies: Reply from glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
In reply to: Message from stasys1 at cox.net (stasys1 at cox.net) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)