Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?
From: richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man)
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:16:20 -0700
References: <C6A755DE.52B65%mark@rabinergroup.com> <9A4C83C9-1D7C-40C3-9184-C466ABE0A869@mac.com> <001001ca1acd$fe2efab0$80f510ac@chris0436b6050>
 
Most bride's mothers just know that a P&S is a point and shoot, and
anything else is a PRO camera....

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Chris Williams<zoeica at mac.com> wrote:
> I've yet to see that question pop up in any wedding magazine, and those
> magazines have really whacked photography questions. Some wedding magazines
> still tell the bride to make sure they get the negatives from the
> photographer. Just a few years behind in some cases.
>
> That .0001% knowing 24x36, being Tina of course. :)
>



-- 
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog:
http://rfman.wordpress.com
// book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963
Replies: Reply from leowesson at gmail.com (leo wesson) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
 In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from zoeica at mac.com (Chris Williams) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)