Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/08/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?
From: richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man)
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:34:53 -0700
References: <C6A5EF2E.1621%lug@steveunsworth.co.uk> <2A1EF42A-81D3-4B79-A33B-40166BB45422@iisaka.com> <72B29F90-8891-45B7-BB22-E1A364EE952F@gmail.com> <36172e5a0908101431s5aa7ef03w345dfee62a79ef42@mail.gmail.com> <7ac27f4f0908101440g3af041cbxcf375988b5bf8211@mail.gmail.com> <051b01ca1a04$51e7af50$f5b70df0$@net> <BLU0-SMTP86394CF9A84CEF133A72748C060@phx.gbl>
Vick, no offense, but your track record ain't so hot there!! :-)
There is an M9 in the future, for sure :-) All it takes is retirement
money, stock market going up a point, letting go of one of your prized
lens... etc. :-)
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Vick Ko<vick.ko at sympatico.ca> wrote:
...
>
> The irrational side won, and yes, I'm happey with the M8. ?Don't see myself
> going to M9 though.
> ....Vick
--
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog:
http://rfman.wordpress.com
// book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963
In reply to:
Message from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from ken at iisaka.com (Ken Iisaka) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from leowesson at gmail.com (Leo Wesson) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from jshul at comcast.net (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)