Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/07/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Richard Man wrote: >I don't know how Mark does his math, but it's also true that the >apparent resolution increase (or whatever you call it), is linear to >one dimension, so on the short side, the Hassy is almost 20% larger, >but on the long side, it's only about 10%. Let's also keep in mind that the number of pixels is does not equal resolution, it's the number of samples. Resolution also depends on the image delivered to the sensor. Might be good to see some comparative tests before reaching any conclusions. Doug Herr Birdman of Sacramento http://www.wildlightphoto.com