Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/07/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I don't know how Mark does his math, but it's also true that the apparent resolution increase (or whatever you call it), is linear to one dimension, so on the short side, the Hassy is almost 20% larger, but on the long side, it's only about 10%. On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Nathan Wajsman<photo at frozenlight.eu> wrote: > How do you do your math? > > Hassy sensor: 1798.3 sq.mm > Leica sensor: 1350 sq.mm > > That makes the Hassy sensor 33% larger than the Leica one. Or, the other > way > round, the Leica sensor is 25% smaller than the Hassy one. Either way, the > difference is well more than 10%. > -- // richard m: richard @imagecraft.com // w: http://www.rfman.com blog: http://rfman.wordpress.com // book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963